Moses-support Digest, Vol 100, Issue 84

Send Moses-support mailing list submissions to
moses-support@mit.edu

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
moses-support-request@mit.edu

You can reach the person managing the list at
moses-support-owner@mit.edu

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Moses-support digest..."


Today's Topics:

1. Re: Number of Unique Hypotheses in the N-best List (Matthias Huck)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 17:05:41 +0000
From: Matthias Huck <mhuck@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [Moses-support] Number of Unique Hypotheses in the N-best
List
To: Moses-support <moses-support@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <1424797541.2192.513.camel@portedgar>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi Erin?,

On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 16:24 +0000, Matthias Huck wrote:
> I'd assume that your 32 entries of the n-best list weren't actually
> unique, though, but a number of duplicates of the (two) very same
> outputs, as "distinct" should simply avoid duplicate entries.

Actually, could you please check for us whether I'm right with this
assumption? If I'm not, then some other modification since version 2.1
might affect your experiment. I hope that's not the case.

Run something like
cut -d'|' -f4 | sort | uniq | wc -l
on the n-best list with 32 entries. It should print 2.

Or did you do this already? (You're mentioning "unique hypotheses" in
your mail.)

Cheers,
Matthias



--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Moses-support mailing list
Moses-support@mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support


End of Moses-support Digest, Vol 100, Issue 84
**********************************************

0 Response to "Moses-support Digest, Vol 100, Issue 84"

Post a Comment