Moses-support Digest, Vol 111, Issue 15

Send Moses-support mailing list submissions to
moses-support@mit.edu

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
moses-support-request@mit.edu

You can reach the person managing the list at
moses-support-owner@mit.edu

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Moses-support digest..."


Today's Topics:

1. Re: Which symal? (Ergun Bicici)
2. Re: Error compiling: libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.20'
not found (Lane Schwartz)
3. Re: Which symal? (Hieu Hoang)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 15:05:50 +0100
From: Ergun Bicici <ergun.bicici@dfki.de>
Subject: Re: [Moses-support] Which symal?
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Cc: "moses-support@mit.edu" <moses-support@mit.edu>
Message-ID:
<CAB2pGnchMeHyTeZWKOtf-SR9T8puRHMi_e__-McffgAAZe_j_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi,

I compiled another Moses instance and symal appears to be copied from mgiza
still to mosesdecoder/bin/. ?


*Best Regards,*
Ergun

Ergun Bi?ici
DFKI Projektb?ro Berlin


On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Ergun Bicici <Ergun.Bicici@computing.dcu.ie
> wrote:

>
> Moses' symal:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.nlp.moses.user/11544
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Ergun
>
> Ergun Bi?ici, CNGL, School of Computing, DCU, www.cngl.ie
> http://www.computing.dcu.ie/~ebicici/
>
>
> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Jeroen Vermeulen <
> jtv@precisiontranslationtools.com> wrote:
>
>> The symal source code is duplicated between the moses-smt and mgiza
>> repositories. Does it make sense to have both? They're quietly
>> diverging, which is probably a bad thing.
>>
>> Here's the differences that I can see:
>> * I modernized the code in moses-smt. Big diff, no functional change.
>> * The moses-smt version supports longer source and target strings.
>> * The mgiza version has what looks like some extra debug output.
>> * The moses-smt version avoids non-portable use of /dev/stdout.
>> * One builds through bjam, the other through cmake.
>>
>> Could we perhaps just delete the mgiza one, and tell people to use the
>> one from moses instead?
>>
>>
>> Jeroen
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moses-support mailing list
>> Moses-support@mit.edu
>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/private/moses-support/attachments/20160110/4da38d61/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 08:10:52 -0600
From: Lane Schwartz <dowobeha@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Moses-support] Error compiling: libstdc++.so.6: version
`GLIBCXX_3.4.20' not found
To: "moses-support@mit.edu" <moses-support@mit.edu>
Message-ID:
<CABv3vZmdhMNA=34zXcWruJHZcsE-GEKs20SDoUk3F3jCdXHtDg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

I figured it out. I was using too old of a version of gcc.

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Lane Schwartz <dowobeha@gmail.com> wrote:

> Here's the log file.
>
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Lane Schwartz <dowobeha@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to compile moses on a new machine (Centos 6.7), and I'm
>> getting a ton of errors with the unit tests. Many unit tests failed, all
>> with this error (differing obviously in which test failed):
>>
>>
>> phrase-extract/bin/ScoreFeatureTest.test/gcc-4.7.1/debug/link-static/threading-multi/ScoreFeatureTest:
>> /usr/local/gcc-4.7.1/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.20' not
>> found (required by
>> phrase-extract/bin/ScoreFeatureTest.test/gcc-4.7.1/debug/link-static/threading-multi/ScoreFeatureTest)
>>
>> phrase-extract/bin/ScoreFeatureTest.test/gcc-4.7.1/debug/link-static/threading-multi/ScoreFeatureTest:
>> /usr/local/gcc-4.7.1/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.20' not
>> found (required by
>> /usr/local/boost/1.58.0/lib/libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0)
>>
>>
>> I'm using gcc-4.7.1, so I'm not sure why the unit test is complaining
>> about not finding version 3.4.20 of libstdc++.
>>
>> Any ideas or tips would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Lane
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> When a place gets crowded enough to require ID's, social collapse is not
> far away. It is time to go elsewhere. The best thing about space travel
> is that it made it possible to go elsewhere.
> -- R.A. Heinlein, "Time Enough For Love"
>



--
When a place gets crowded enough to require ID's, social collapse is not
far away. It is time to go elsewhere. The best thing about space travel
is that it made it possible to go elsewhere.
-- R.A. Heinlein, "Time Enough For Love"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/private/moses-support/attachments/20160110/70d2ae49/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:34:59 +0000
From: Hieu Hoang <hieuhoang@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Moses-support] Which symal?
To: Ergun Bicici <ergun.bicici@dfki.de>
Cc: moses-support <moses-support@mit.edu>
Message-ID:
<CAEKMkbjP7_y8PjjbC0DT2EX7Sx=xM-dVSYREk8Si3fzBevC7wg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

What the exact commands u used to compile moses and mgiza? I'm pretty sure
they don't overwrite each other unless you ask them too. They're
independent projects
On 10 Jan 2016 14:07, "Ergun Bicici" <ergun.bicici@dfki.de> wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> I compiled another Moses instance and symal appears to be copied from
> mgiza still to mosesdecoder/bin/. ?
>
>
> *Best Regards,*
> Ergun
>
> Ergun Bi?ici
> DFKI Projektb?ro Berlin
>
>
> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Ergun Bicici <
> Ergun.Bicici@computing.dcu.ie> wrote:
>
>>
>> Moses' symal:
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.nlp.moses.user/11544
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Ergun
>>
>> Ergun Bi?ici, CNGL, School of Computing, DCU, www.cngl.ie
>> http://www.computing.dcu.ie/~ebicici/
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Jeroen Vermeulen <
>> jtv@precisiontranslationtools.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The symal source code is duplicated between the moses-smt and mgiza
>>> repositories. Does it make sense to have both? They're quietly
>>> diverging, which is probably a bad thing.
>>>
>>> Here's the differences that I can see:
>>> * I modernized the code in moses-smt. Big diff, no functional change.
>>> * The moses-smt version supports longer source and target strings.
>>> * The mgiza version has what looks like some extra debug output.
>>> * The moses-smt version avoids non-portable use of /dev/stdout.
>>> * One builds through bjam, the other through cmake.
>>>
>>> Could we perhaps just delete the mgiza one, and tell people to use the
>>> one from moses instead?
>>>
>>>
>>> Jeroen
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moses-support mailing list
>>> Moses-support@mit.edu
>>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
>>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moses-support mailing list
> Moses-support@mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/private/moses-support/attachments/20160110/89ce4a5d/attachment.html

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Moses-support mailing list
Moses-support@mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support


End of Moses-support Digest, Vol 111, Issue 15
**********************************************

Tweet